In Defense of Traditional Marriage By R. Anderson Essay

In Defense of Traditional Marriage By R. Anderson - Essay ExampleAnderson in his term about traditional conglutinations argues that a marriage should still be viewed in the traditional sense of it being a reunion between a homo and woman for the purpose of procreation as is indicated in the constitution (Anderson, 2013). His argument therefore dispels the gay activists attempts to cave in this vocaliseing changed in the formal documents simply because they have already been accorded the right to get married. The article further ascertains that this definition of marriage has been in existence way before there was any evidence of kindred sex marriages and hence cannot be changed now. Further more than, the moment the federal government will change this definition it will mean that it will be on the thoroughfare to changing other things as well and being cornered to allow enforcement of other untraditional issues in the marriage institution such as allowing polygamy and the like s. Anderson stands with his word that simply because the gays were allowed to get married in the states that they have does not allow them the power to demand a change of the traditional institutional definition of marriage (Anderson, 2013). They should be glad with what they have been accorded and remain silent on the issue and let traditions remain as they have always been.The argument by Anderson leans more towards deductive reasoning where he starts by stating the general rules and laws of marriages that have always been and moves to focusing on the sole aspect of procreation. This argument is based on save one major point and a few others that are not too strong to support the traditional marriages or even provide passable reason to avoid the definition of marriage being changed in the constitution despite it being an age old definition whose changes will open up a Pandoras box of other issues related to modern marriages. The argument of